Skip to main content

It’s business as usual Mr President!


By Rawlings Magede

It will be very unfair to compare President Emmerson Mnangagwa and the current Tanzanian President John Pombe Magufuli.This is so in the sense that the two African countries face different problems at the moment. For Magufuli he has proved his critics wrong by introducing sweeping reforms in his government that has even forced his doomsayers to acknowledge that its indeed no longer business as usual. On the other hand, Mnangagwa is presently seized with the mammoth task of managing relations within ZANU PF and ensuring that he does not disappoint those who help him ascend to the highest throne in the land.

What is rather interesting about these two Presidents is that they all belong to political parties that have been in power for a long time and the founding fathers of their parties (Mugabe and Nyerere) are both credited for their stance on the need for black empowerment. When Magufuli took over Presidency in 2015, Tanzania was burdened by a myriad of problems that include ghost workers in the civil service and corruption by officials connected to his party, Chama Cha Mapinduzi among other ills. But today he has made steady progress in addressing these problems.
Coincidentally President Mnangagwa inherited a government burdened by rampant corruption, poor economic policies and in some instances gross incompetence by those in government. In the case of Magufuli, his current tenure has brought a lot of positives and incremental gains for Tanzania. He has implemented sweeping reforms and has managed to reconfigure the Chama Cha Mapinduzi party.

The thousands of people who took heed to the call by the war veterans to stage a march against former president, Mugabe, had hoped that the new president was going to lead a new era that would see a departure from the old way of running a government. Most people criticized Mugabe’s administration of recycling deadwood which he interchangeably rotated among government ministries for his own parochial interests. In Mugabe’s era there are Ministries whose actual mandate was never known by the public, a clear example is the Psychomotor Ministry that was led by Josiah Hungwe.In my view such a practice by Mugabe forced citizens to lose trust and confidence in certain Ministries. Rather than have confidence in such Ministries, citizens would make jokes out of the Ministers appointed by Mugabe. Even his cabinet reshuffle did not even reflect “reshuffling” but was just a cheap way used to coerce his lieutenants to continue supporting him.

However, on 1 December 2017, the nation awoke to the news that President Mnangagwa had announced his long awaited cabinet. From the day he was inaugurated, the new President in my view had hit the ground running by implementing cost cutting measures that even saw him missing the inauguration of Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta. He even refused to have the expensive Mercedes Benz used by Mugabe as part of his motorcade. For a moment I concurred with his supporters that the President was on the right path.

His latest cabinet is uninspiring, seems like a return to the old day of the Mugabe era and is not in tandem with his earlier calls on rebuilding the country. Most of the Ministers in the new cabinet presided over corrupt activities and still owe citizens an explanation. The new cabinet has also seen the inclusion of military personnel who have taken up two key ministries (Agriculture and Foreign Affairs respectively). Whether the military personnel have a proven track record of competency remains to be seen and is the subject for another day.

My greatest disappointment with the new cabinet is the lack of inspiration from some of the appointed Ministers. In my view, the new cabinet seems to be a reward by the President of his allies who over the years advanced his bid to succeed former president Mugabe. What is even frustrating is the fact that some of the old cabinet ministers reappointed have long gone past their expiry date. Was the new cabinet not supposed to be made up of new faces who have enthusiasm and energy to work? Even the omission of someone hardworking like Mayor Justice Wadyajena is shocking given the sterling work he did when he was chairing the Parliamentary Portfolio committee on Youth and Indigenization. Former Ministers of Youth Savior Kasukuwere and Patrick Zhuwawo dreaded appearing before the committee where they knew that the committee was tough on issues of transparency and accountability.

It even baffles the mind why the president opted to even combine the Ministry of Women affairs and Youth given that the two Ministries are diverse and require special attention. Even the age of the new Minister Sithembiso Nyoni is even an insult to the ordinary youth. Citizens expected that the President was going to go the Magufuli way and implement sweeping reforms firstly by appointing new and capable ministers in his cabinet so that there is some semblance of a “new era”.

With all due respect to Ambassador Khaya Moyo, isn’t the Energy Ministry too big for him given that his recent deployments have been around the Information portfolio and then Economic planning. I can go on and analyze each ministry and highlight loopholes and gaps. In any democracy, the success of any Ministry is dependent on citizens’ confidence in the minister leading that particular Ministry. I am totally aware that there are permanent secretaries within the various Ministries who do the majority of the work but the contribution and innovation by Ministers is key and must not be overlooked. In our case, the crop of the redeployed ministers in the new cabinet have proved over a long time that they are unable to run ministries effectively and even is some cases looted public funds for self-enrichment.

The new cabinet by the President in my view is a contradiction to his recent calls to have a corrupt free country and quality service delivery. What can the recycled Ministers bring that is new and has innovation? What is important to note is that there are some faces within his new cabinet that are detested by many because of gross incompetence and corruption. For example, Ministers like Obert Mpofu have been implicated in corruption scandals even under the Mugabe administration.

In the final analysis, there are some who have argued that permanent secretaries within the various ministries are hardworking and overshadow the incompetent Ministers. It remains to be seen whether the new ministers will reform and change for the better. As for me it seems like business as usual.

Rawlings Magede is a rural political enthusiast from Gokwe-Kana who writes in his personal capacity. He tweets @rawedges and contactable on vamagede@gmail.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Peace Education as a tool for Post-Conflict Healing in Rwanda

By Rawlings Magede My visit to one of the Genocide memorials During the past weeks I was holed up in Rwanda visiting memorial sites and villages in a quest to learn more on how the country has recovered years after the 1994 genocide that left more than 800,000 civilians dead. The genocide lasted for hundred days and engulfed the country into a turmoil as organised killings and massacres of the Tutsi escalated. The colonial practice of ethnic profiling on identity documents aided in the easy identification of Tutsi minorities during roadblocks and targeted searches. Churches that had since time immemorial been credited for speaking truth to power become complicit in the killings and often deceitfully offered “safe” refuge to Tutsis but only alerted the Interahamwe’s (    Hutu militias) who massacred hundreds of thousands in cold blood. The snail’s pace by the international community to intervene and stop the killings further aided the killers and saw the killings stretching up to hund

HEROES DAY: A BETRAYAL OF WHAT TRUE HEROES STOOD FOR!

When Traitors celebrate Lieutenant General Joseph Arthur Ankrah led the coup against Kwame Nkrumah in early 1966 while he was away in Vietnam attending a Peace Initiative in Vietnam which sought to end the war between America and Northern Vietnam. Nkrumah’s crime they said was of making the African people politically conscious about their resources among other things. His book that he had published in 1965, Neo Colonialism, The last stage of Imperialism”, had caused a lot of hype and debate especially in Western governments. His vision was to have an African society that utilised its resources and enjoyed equality. Nkrumah survived several assassination attempts on his life; the last being the one attempted in 1964.This coup attempt brought a lot of raft changes in his administration. He fired several army generals whom he didn’t trust anymore and he formed a new regiment known as the Presidential Regimental Guard which had the sole mandate of ensuring his own security. In 1966 aft

The ICC and the legacy of the LRA Abductions in Uganda

  By Rawlings Magede With a former LRA Commander Over the past weeks, I had   a series of engagements   with representatives from the International Criminal Court (ICC) and former commanders and returnees of Uganda’s notorious rebel group, Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA).The rebel group remains active today and its led     by Joseph Kony.The engagements touched on a number of issues ranging from the conviction of former LRA commander, Dominic Ongwen by the ICC,the issue of reparations for victims of Ongwen and then the integration process of former LRA returnees into communities in Northern Uganda. The ICC and LRA On 16 December 2003, the Ugandan government referred the war crimes by the LRA to the prosecutor of the ICC.Since 1986, the LRA led by its leader, Joseph Kony had wrecked havoc on the Acholi people of Northern Uganda. The move by the Uganda government   was the first time that a state party had invoked Articles 13(a) and 14 of the Rome Statute in order to vest the Court with